17 Kasım 2014 Pazartesi

KEN BLOCK'S GYMKHANA SEVEN WILD IN THE STREETS OF LOS ANGELES [HOONIGAN]



We've just received a delivery fresh from the information superhighway: Ken Block's new Gymkhana video, the seventh instalment of the rubber-obilterating YouTube series, has landed.
And Kenny B's got himself a new whip. With an 845bhp, four-wheel-drive, 1965 ‘Notchback' Ford Mustang replacing his old Fiesta, Ken is back to his usual trick of sliding around a cityscape while bonfiring as many rear tyres as possible.
Los Angeles is the location of choice for the seventh instalment of the frightfully successful Hoonigan Gymkhana chain. And, as you'll see, things have been cranked up a notch since jovially skidding a Subaru WRX STI around an abandoned airfield back in the day.

The twelve-minute flick opens with Ken's new ride chained to the wall. Thanks to a high-revved drop of the clutch, Ken gives a very visual demonstration of exactly how a four-wheel-drive Ford Mustang lays down its power - or, rather, doesn't lay down its power. Lighting up all four corners in gratuitous slow-mo, Mr Block turns his tyres into smoke at a rate we've never witnessed before.

Warehouse suitably hotboxed, he then heads out on the streets to leave a giant Pirelli-inked spirograph around some of Los Angeles' most iconic locations.

Downtown, Randy's Donuts, the freeways, the Sixth Street Viaduct, Chinatown, and the LA river all fall victim to Ken's unique territory tagging, as he shows what a Dakar-spec all wheel-drive transmission from Sadev can do.

Entering corners in a fashion technically described as 'mostly backwards', Ken seems to have rather nailed this drifting thing, kiss whatever apex he's aiming for with at least one of the lenses of the GoPros peppered around the deranged 'Hoonicorn'.

Having booted his way through the city - and away from The Law - the film ends with a sideways, snaking run through the canyons to the top of the Hollywood Sign. Where, predictably, he celebrates with some donuts... on the side of a mountain.

"The access to locations for this project was incredible," said Block. "Obviously the film commission in Los Angeles is quite good and accustomed to working with projects that involve driving all the time. However this was the first and only time that anyone has done actual live-action driving and filming at the top of the Hollywood sign. Some of the permissions we had to obtain from the Department of Homeland Security were intense!"

With the help of his new monstrous Mustang, the combination of local lowriders and impeccable/ballsy timing, a quick dip in the LA river and a smoky run in with the cops, this is the most cinematic version of Ken's successful formula we've seen yet.

12 Haziran 2014 Perşembe

Neymar leads Brazil to 3-1 win over Croatia

Yahoo Sports Videos Penalty call boosts Brazil to World Cup opening win Penalty call boosts Brazil to World Cup opening win  1 Penalty call boosts Brazil to World Cup opening win Penalty call boosts Brazil to World Cup opening win 2 Neymar comes through for host country Brazil Neymar comes through for host country Brazil 3 Brazil comes alive for World Cup opening ceremony Brazil comes alive for World Cup opening ceremony 4 Police, Protesters Clash Before World Cup Opener Police, Protesters Clash Before World Cup Opener 5 Meet the Brazuca - 'The Most Advanced Soccer Ball Ever Made' Meet the Brazuca - 'The Most Advanced Soccer Ball Ever Made' 6 Tear gas in the air on World Cup opening day Tear gas in the air on World Cup opening day 7 Raw: Space Station Crew Ready for World Cup Raw: Space Station Crew Ready for World Cup 8 Rio airport workers strike on eve of world cup Rio airport workers strike on eve of world cup 9 Craftsman Makes Replica of Gold World Cup Trophy Craftsman Makes Replica of Gold World Cup Trophy 10 World Cup 2014: Goal Control goal-line technology to be used in Brazil World Cup 2014: Goal Control goal-line technology to be used in Brazil Load More SAO PAULO (AP) -- Neymar showed why he is carrying Brazil's hopes at the World Cup, scoring twice on Thursday to help the underwhelming hosts escape a disappointing start to the tournament. Final BRA 3 - 1 CRO Group Stage World Soccer Pick'em Think you can beat Mourinho? Pick Distribution CRO 1% DRAW 4% BRA 95% Box Score Make Your Pick! With Brazil struggling and down a goal against a spirited Croatian team, Neymar came through to lead his team to a 3-1 win in the opening match, scoring once in each half. The killer goal to make the score 2-1 was a hotly contested penalty awarded by Japanese referee Yuichi Nishimura. ''Things weren't going well,'' he said. ''The first match is always difficult, we were anxious, we were nervous. I'm glad I was able to get the goals we needed at the time we needed them.'' ''He is a special player and we know that,'' Brazil coach Luiz Felipe Scolari said. ''And he needs to know that we know that.'' Brazil got off to a slow start in its home tournament. Defender Marcelo found his own net while trying to clear a low cross by Ivica Olic in the 11th minute, stunning the crowd of more than 62,100 packing the Itaquerao Stadium. But Neymar equalized in the 29th, firing a perfectly placed low shot that went in off the post. He said he didn't hit the ball perfectly, ''but it went in, it's all that matters.'' ''It's important to start these tournaments on the right foot, with a victory,'' said Neymar. ''I'm happy that I got to score, but the entire team deserves credit. We maintained our calm and showed we could battle back.'' The game turned on a controversial penalty awarded by Nishimura in the second half after striker Fred went down inside the area under minimal contact from defender Dejan Lovren. Neymar scored from the spot in the 71st minute, getting his 33rd goal with Brazil. Croatia goalkeeper Stipe Pletikosa nearly saved Neymar's shot, but it was struck hard enough to deflect into the net. The Croatians were furious. Jose Mourinho's exclusive World Cup analysis ''If that was a penalty, we should be playing basketball. Those kinds of fouls are penalized there,'' Croatia coach Niko Kovac said. ''That is shameful, this is not a World Cup referee. He had one kind of criteria for them and another for us. The rules were not the same,'' Kovac said. As Croatia searched desperately for an equalizer, Oscar added to the lead in the first minute of injury time with a toe poke from just outside the penalty area. A draw would have been a huge disappointment for Brazil, which had won its opening match the last eight times and is overwhelming favorite to win the competition. ''The team didn't give up,'' Brazil defender David Luiz said ''We knew it would be hard but we played well and got that first goal and then the victory.'' The tournament finally got underway as planned after months of talk about the preparation problems that plagued Brazil since it was picked as host seven years ago. The troubled Itaquerao, which wasn't fully finished for the opener, held up without major setbacks to fans or the match itself, although part of the lights atop the pitch went out a few times for brief periods in the first half. --- Lineups: Brazil: Julio Cesar, Dani Alves, Thiago Silva, David Luiz, Marcelo, Luiz Gustavo, Paulinho (Hernanes, 63), Oscar, Neymar (Ramires, 88), Hulk (Bernard, 68), Fred. Croatia: Stipe Pletikosa, Sime Vrsaljko, Darijo Srna, Dejan Lovren, Vedran Corluka, Ivan Rakitic, Nikica Jelavic (Ante Rebic, 78), Luka Modric, Ivan Perisic, Ivica Olic, Mateo Kovacic (Marcelo Brozovic, 61). --- Follow Tales Azzoni at http://twitter.com/tazzoni

27 Mayıs 2012 Pazar

Fotografium Nikon D3200 Profesyonel Fotoğraf Makinesi Hediye Ediyor.

Fotografium Nikon D3200 Profesyonel Fotoğraf Makinesi Hediye Ediyor. Siz de katılın Nikon D3200, Lowepro Çanta (DSLR Video Fastpack 250 AW Sırt Çantası) ve Slik Tripod (Slik 500DX Tripod) kazanma şansı elde edin. http://goo.gl/ciXjD?ref=1382 adresini ziyaret ederek detaylı bilgi alabilirsiniz.

17 Ekim 2011 Pazartesi

Harry Connick Jnr: "Why Would He Call Richard Gere, Not Me?"



“I’m not a movie star. People know me, but they don’t necessarily know what they know me for. I get recognised, but it’s not like Justin Bieber. It’s a nice thing, people are cool.”
And he’s absolutely right. Harry Connick Jnr is just one of those names that’s been around forever, but doesn’t attach itself to any one project. He was the smooth vocal chords on the sountrack of When Harry Met Sally, but he wasn’t in it. He appeared in Independence Day but he’s not Will Smith. Is it because he’s a singer as well, that he defies a category?
“I would say I’m right in the middle,” he decides, when asked to position himself on the singer/actor spectrum. “Because when I’m acting, I’m in a different place, singing is the last thing on my mind, and when I’m on stage, there’s no acting at all involved, not even presentation, it’s just who I am.”
If it’s bugged him that his natural ease in both fields has made him perceived as a jack of all trades, master of none, there’s no sign of it.
“When Chicago came out, I was talking to Harvey Weinstein, and I asked him, “Richard Gere’s a good friend of mine. Why would you call him and not me? That’s what I do!” He started laughing, and he didn’t answer, which is probably that Richard’s a big movie star.
“Perhaps I’ve not been offered movies that I would have been if I didn’t play the piano. I don’t see it, they just don’t call me! I totally get it though. We’ve all been to the movies where we’ve seen a singer on screen, and thought, ‘Great, career move’ and the same with an actor on stage, so I get it, I’m sure there’s some pigeon-holing going on, but I swear on my life it doesn’t affect me, it probably affects those people not hiring me, not me.”
“I just do the things I love to do,” he exclaims, and right now that includes the film Dolphin Tale. Not many people could make a film about children tending to an injured dolphin bearable, but if there are a few people in the world, Harry Connick Jnr is among them, and he is full of enthusiasm for this latest project (co-starring Morgan Freeman, Ashley Judd, Kris Kristofferson), which has enjoyed rapturous reception at the US cinema:
“I didn’t know the story,” Connick relates. “I read the script of what looked like a fun family movie, called up the director, asked him, ‘How did you think of this?’ Turns out it’s a real story, I was kind of embarrassed that I didn’t know about it. When I found out it was true, I thought I had to be part of it.
Dolphin Tale relates how Winter lost her tail but was given another one by the tireless efforts of animal surgeons in Florida, and inspired lots of helpful technology and morale-boosting along the way. The dolphin in the film is played by the very Winter of the true story, and she impressed her cast mates:
“She turned up on time, she knew her lines, she was better than me,” reports Connick. “It was only when I got down to Florida and started working with her, I noticed there was something about her. I think dolphins have their own type of intelligence, which once in a while, crosses with human intelligence, but I don’t claim to know enough about it.”
Connick is also bright enough to avoid the cliché that he’s now any type of reconstructed animal activist after working on such a film.
“No, I think it’s important to choose what you want to fight for very carefully. As a figure of any public recognition, you can water down your effectiveness very easily. Although I feel for the animals there, there are people more knowledgeable and suited to working for that – I choose to spend my time in New Orleans with the musicians there, that’s what I’m an activist for. I wouldn’t be a good representative for other stuff.”
Ahh, New Orleans, the bed of Connick’s Deep Southern easy manners, charm, musical influence and where he spent years perfecting his craft before taking himself off to New York as a young man. He remembers it fondly:
“The whole American Idol way of looking at things is the antithesis of what I grew up with. There are a whole lot of kids wanting to be famous now, whereas if I’d even mentioned that word to one of my teachers, I would have got into a whole load of trouble. We practised and practised, and if opportunity came around, we would have had the skills to be prepared for it. These days, they see the result a lot quicker than they see the process, and that can be a little scary. I think when you’re a kid and you see all of the glory, it may affect your work ethic. Not the kids on this latest film, though, I should stress, they’re hard workers.”
Connick appears to have it all – good looks, talent, pots of money and awards, one of those statistic-defying happy Hollywood marriages and full family life. How does he stay so normal and avoid any diva business?
“My manager told me a long time ago, you can be as famous as you want to be, it’s about the choices you make. I guess I could have been a lot more famous, but I don’t want that. I love my wife, she loves me, so I got really, really lucky in finding a girl that I was compatible with.
“As for any diva business, I’ve got a lot of cousins, a lot of family with my last name and if I came across like that, and none of us were raised like that. My dad was always saying, ‘be on time, be nice to people.’ When I was 18, I was angry all the time, now it’s about getting my kids through school, and helping them. It’s made me a better artist, because it’s allowed me to be in a more peaceful place. I have a big ego, and I’m a confident person, but when it comes down to being a jerk, that doesn’t work for me, I tried it... for about ten years.”
One time Connick was moved to speak out was in Australia, two years ago, when the US star found himself on the judging panel of a variety show, where one of the acts was Jackson Jive – a ‘tribute’ band choosing to glorify their act by blacking up their faces. Connick spoke out against this on the show, and faced a torrent of criticism in the Australian press at the time. Here in London, his ‘people’ are frustrated that he’s asked again about this, but, two years later, it seems the American star still has plenty to say...
“I didn’t say I was offended, I just said I couldn’t be a part of this. Certain markets think they live under a rock, but this is 2011 and when you’re on TV, it goes all around the world, so if there’s a blackface sketch and I’m whooping it up down in Australia, people are at home are going to be ‘are you kidding?’ That’s offensive to America. That was a very specific occurrence. I’m not a civil rights activist, but if something’s going on... They have no idea about American history, but you can’t blame people for not knowing what America went through...”
The publicist in the room is getting anxious now, and Connick apologies for going off on a tangent. No one’s really cross, though, as he grins at everyone with a megawatt smile, and asks, “My bad. Now, who wants to talk about dolphins?”
Dolphin Tale is now showing in UK cinemas.Harry Connick Jnr

Joanna Yeates Trial: Vincent Tabak 'Strangled Jo To Stop Screams'

Joanna Yeates 
 Vincent Tabak claims he strangled Joanna Yeates for 20 seconds after she screamed when he put his arm around her, a court has been told.Â
Brief extracts from Tabak's defence statement were read out to a jury for the first time as the pathologist who inspected her body was re-examined by the prosecution.
Tabak, who admits manslaughter but denies murder, claims he initially put his hand over her mouth to stop the screams, Nigel Lickley QC told Bristol Crown Court.
The defendant claims to have used "no more than moderate force", Mr Lickley added.
Referring to Tabak's statement, Mr Lickley said: "He removed the hand from the mouth and the screaming continued and then he put the hand around the throat. He believes it was the one from around her back and held it there for about 20 seconds."
In the statement, Tabak claims he "didn't intend death or serious injury", Mr Lickley added.
Mr Lickley asked pathologist Russell Delaney about Tabak's statement that he held Miss Yeates's throat "for about 20 seconds".
Dr Delaney replied: "That period of time would be sufficient to cause the signs of venous obstruction and would be long enough to result in her death."
The statement was referred to after Tabak's QC William Clegg suggested his client used just one hand to strangle her. Dr Delaney said he "cannot exclude the use of one hand" as the claim was made.
Miss Yeates suffered 43 injuries at the hands of Tabak at her flat in Clifton, Bristol, on December 17, Bristol Crown Court has heard.

Reports: Investigation To Show Liam Fox 'Breached Ministerial Code Of Conduct'


Liam Fox

An official report into former defence secretary Liam Fox's links with his self-styled adviser Adam Werritty is expected to find that he breached the Ministerial Code of Conduct.
The findings of Cabinet Secretary Sir Gus O'Donnell - who was due to deliver his report to David Cameron on Monday night - will be published on Tuesday.
The Guardian reported the country's most senior civil servant will deliver a "damning" verdict on Dr Fox's conduct - while accepting that he had not personally gained financially from his relationship with Mr Werritty.
Dr Fox finally resigned on Friday amid a welter of allegations suggesting his close contacts with his best man and former flatmate breached Whitehall rules.
Sir Gus was last week ordered by the Prime Minister to take over an internal Ministry of Defence inquiry in an effort to provide answers to "all remaining questions".
An interim MoD report has already established that the then defence secretary had met Mr Werritty - who handed out business cards describing himself as Dr Fox's adviser even though he had no official role - 40 times since coming to office.
Their contacts included trips abroad and meetings at the MoD - including talks with the Israeli ambassador, dinner with the new US commander of international forces in Afghanistan, and a meeting in Dubai with a defence supplier without MoD officials present.

Poll Gives Labour Biggest Lead Since 2010 General Election

Ed Miliband 
 Labour has opened up its biggest lead over the Conservatives since last year's general election, according to an opinion poll.
The Populus poll for The Times gives the Labour Party an eight-point advantage over the Tories while support for the Liberal Democrats has dropped into single percentage figures.
The poll puts Labour on 41%, three points up on last month, while the Conservatives are down one point on 33%, and the Lib Dems down four to 8% - the lowest levels of support for the two Government parties in a Populus poll since they went into coalition together.
The findings suggest that support for the two parties has been hit by concerns about the economy as well the fallout from the resignation of former defence secretary Liam Fox.
Populus interviewed 1,511 adults aged 18 and over by telephone between October 14 and 16.

Hillsborough Justice Campaign Reaches House Of Commons

Hillsborough Files Mps 
 
The House Of Commons has debated the controversy surrounding the government's delay in releasing confidential Cabinet papers relating to the 1989 Hillsborough Stadium disaster.
The debate was watched by many of the relatives of the 96 Liverpool fans crushed to death at Sheffield Wednesday's stadium.
Triggered by a government e-petition that has attracted more than 130,000 signatures since it was set up over the summer, the debate was led by Steve Rotheram, Labour MP for Liverpool Walton.
Rotheram said the Thatcher government at the time of the disaster had briefed against the fans. Describing the alleged briefings as "a convenient excuse to aggregate responsibility," Rotheram then proceeded to read out the names of every person killed in the disaster.
He said he was doing this because the names had never been officially entered into the Parliamentary register before. Around 20 people in the public gallery had travelled to the commons to watch the debate. Many of them were clearly emotional as the names and their ages were slowly read out by Rotheram over the course of five minutes.
"Rest in peace, Justice for the 96," he said before sitting down to unconventional applause from several MPs in the chamber and virtually everyone sitting in the public gallery.
Responding for the government, Home Secretary Theresa may paid tribute to Steve Rotheram, and to the support that people on Merseyside have given to the campaign over more than 20 years. "I will do everything in my power to ensure the families and the public get the truth," she said, promising that no government papers would be withheld from the Hillsborough Panel.
However May didn't give a timescale for the release of the Hillsborough files to the relatives of the victims, saying "It is difficult sensitive and lengthly work and it cannot be rushed."
But the Home Secretary apologised to the families for the way the government had responded to their requests for the files to be released. The government had appealed against a decision by the Information Commissioner to release them earlier this year, creating a common impression that ministers were trying to suppress the files.
The government insists it always planned to release the files to the families, but only once they had gone through the Hillsborough Panel currently investigating all aspects of the disaster.
Theresa May promised that once the files were released - to the relatives first, then the media - there would be "only minimal redaction" to protect junior government officials and the details of family members.
Responding for the Labour front bench, Andy Burnham told MPs that there had been an "orchestrated campaign at Westminster to set the public against the supporters" shortly after the tragedy, which he described as one of the biggest injustices of the 20th century.
He also referred to a story run by The Sun newspaper shortly after Hillsborough, where the paper claimed Liverpool fans had pick-pocketed from the victims - a story the paper has since accepted was untrue.
Andy Burnham suggested that the Hillsborough Panel should consider asking News International to divulge how it came to publish its story, adding that people's views of this story may well have changed in the light of the phone hacking scandal.
MPs are due to debate the Hillsborough files until late on Monday evening, when a motion to release the files is expected to be carried unopposed.
Steve Rotheram MP's speech in the debate can be found on here on the Liverpool Echo website

Energy Bills: Government Says Companies Must Help Customers Save Money

Gas 
 Energy companies must do more to help consumers save money on their bills, the government has said.
Prime Minister David Cameron met the UK’s largest energy suppliers and consumer groups on Monday amid concerns over spiralling gas and electricity costs this winter.
After the meeting Energy Secretary Chris Huhne said that a "substantial" agreement had been reached with the companies, but pulled back from detailing specifics.
"Obviously not everything is agreed," he said. "But I do think we have got a very substantial measure of agreement and we can go forward to this winter with some confidence that we can get people switching more."
The “Big Six” - E.ON, RWE, Centrica, Scottish and Southern Energy, EDF and Iberdrola - are under increasing public pressure over rising consumer prices. With households already squeezed by stagnant incomes and inflation - expected to touch nearly five per cent this week - gas and electricity prices will be a further drain on resources as the weather cools.
Adam Scorer, director of policy at Consumer Focus, said: “I think that whenever you get a time when ... six million households are in poverty, when energy prices have doubled since 2004, that the average energy bill is cracking up to £1,500 it’s not a market issue, it’s not a regulatory issue, it’s a political issue."
Ofgem said last week that the average dual fuel bill in the UK now costs £1,345 per year, with companies making £125 profit per customer.
The regulator said that energy companies have been failing consumers and blocking competition through a combination of complex tariffs, “poor supplier behaviour” and a lack of transparency, and that they need to simplify their price structures. Under the proposals, released on 15 October, consumers who want basic tariffs would get a fixed standing charge set by Ofgem, and standardised formats for price information would allow easier comparison of different suppliers’ rates.
It is this that Scorer said needed to be addressed. “Let’s just hammer down on the way that consumers can save money,” he said. “So paying in the right way - if there’s £200 difference between paying by cheque or by direct debit, let’s tell people that. If you’ve never switched supplier then you’re probably being taken on the highest tariff by an energy company, so let’s tell people that. Let’s tell people what free or heavily discounted insulation is available. So even if it’s only that, for the winter, that’s worthwhile.”
Caroline Flint MP, Labour's shadow energy and climate change secretary, said that the talks offered "cold comfort" to those worrying about paying their bills.
"David Cameron's only response has been to tell the public to wake up and shop around or you've only yourself to blame. This is an insult to people who are worried about paying their bills this winter and shows how out of touch this Tory-led Government is," she said.
Gillian Guy, chief executive of Citizens Advice said ahead of the summit: “This is a huge problem. We’re seeing a rush of people wanting simple, sensible advice about cutting their energy bills. That shows how far the big six have to go in making it easy to get the right deal.”
Calling for a “radical” change from past practices, Ofgem will be releasing detailed proposals to reform the energy market next month, with further regulation to break the “stranglehold of the Big Six” in the wholesale electricity market to follow in December. This is unlikely to be a rapid process, but Ofgem’s proposals last week, followed by today’s meeting, shows that there is some momentum building.
“This [meeting] is about doing probably the only thing that the government can do, which is to strengthen the regulator’s arm and pile the pressure on the companies and say, ‘look, no one believes a word you say. You’re the least trusted sector across the economy. You behave like you’re recently privatised utilities, rather than thrusting, entrepreneurial, competitive companies. You’ve got to change,’ Scorer said.”
A war of words has also developed over the apparent cost of the government’s renewable energy policies. The UK needs to invest around £200 billion to meet its tight emissions reductions targets, and Ofgem said that the cost of government energy efficiency and environmental programmes adds around £100 to the average energy bill.
Supporters say that the long-term cost will be offset by reductions in the country’s dependence on fossil fuel imports, and would mitigate against volatility and future price rises.
Pressure group Friends of the Earth (FOE) said that investments by utilities in gas generation, rather than renewables, was at the root of recent price rises, and called for an enquiry into the big six. By its own calculations, the longer term cost of “dirty” energy would be £300 on consumers’ bills, FOE said.
Others warned that remaining tied to environmental policies could jeopardise the economic recovery.
“The blame game going on around rising energy prices is not helping businesses or households facing very high energy bills. We absolutely need to improve competition in the energy market, but a policy of trying to modify price rises by exhortation is simply not credible. Worse, it hides the very real impact of the expensive renewables programme on energy prices now and, more significantly, over the next decade,” Simon Walker, director general of the Institute of Directors said in a statement ahead of the summit.
“Current policies risk locking us into cleaner and more expensive energy, when the goal should be cleaner and cheaper energy,” he added. “What may have been tolerable in an age of affluence is far less realistic today. Undermining the UK’s competitiveness through high energy costs would do no favours to either economic recovery or the environment.”

Why So Siri-ous?

Screen Shot 2011-10-16 at 3.20.12 PM
Looking over the web and especially the blogosphere over the past couple of days, it seems there is only one thing everyone wants to talk about: Siri. With the iPhone 4S now in millions of peoples’ hands, as expected, it’s clearly the stand-out feature of the device.
But wait. Voice technology has been around for a long time. Or, as one TechCrunch commenter succinctly put it on Erick’s video demo post of Siri: “4 year old software, 8 year old technology.” This recalls one of my favorite aspects of tech blogging. You write about something, then everyone and their mother rushes out to yell something along the lines of “OLD!”. Or, even better, competitors trip over themselves to yell “FIRST!”. So if the stuff Siri is doing is old, and if others did do it FIRST, then why is everyone so damn excited about the feature?
There are a few reasons. But the simplest answer is one that has played out time and time again over the past several years: Apple did it right.
No, Apple is not the first to implement voice technology. Nor are they the first to do it on a phone. In fact, Siri isn’t even Apple’s first foray into voice controls. But their first attempt on the iPhone, quite frankly, sucked. It’s no surprise that no one used it. As for Siri, it’s a company that Apple acquired — they were actually doing some of the same things as a stand-alone third-party app previously. Credit Apple for having the vision and foresight to realize that their previous voice control offering wasn’t competitive, and that system-level integration of Siri into iOS could be magical.
What about Google? It’s true that they’ve been far ahead of Apple in the voice control space for years now. I recall being at an event that Google held in August 2010 in which they showed off some new voice functionality for Android. As I wrote at the time, “Google Unveils Awesomely Fast And Accurate Voice Actions For Android“. And that was true. At the time.
But Google failed on a few fronts with this functionality. First of all, while on paper and in staged demos Google’s technology looks great, they failed to make it compelling enough to entice everyday users to use it. They had a pre-defined set of instructions as to what you could say to get the system to work, and they were pretty rigid. By comparison, Apple placed an emphasis on natural language usage with Siri. There are a number of ways to say something to trigger a certain action. You don’t have to remember a set of commands.
Put another way, Google’s voice search and Siri may look comparable on paper. But in reality, one is something best used by a robot, the other is something best used by a human. And robots don’t buy phones — at least not yet.
In the bigger picture, this is something that Apple seems to understand time and time again that their rivals do not. Technology is an ever-important part of everyones’ lives, but the only way to make it truly accessible to the vast majority of users is to humanize it. That’s Siri. Google, Microsoft, etc — they all fail miserably at doing this.
I’m sure in a few weeks, we’re going to see Google come out and say, “wait, but look, we can do all of the stuff Siri can do too!” They’ll tweak their voice recognition to pick up more human phrases, etc. But it won’t matter. They already lost the mindshare battle. Yes, Android had better voice controls first, but if you ask anyone on the street right now which is the phone with the awesome voice controls, they’ll tell you it’s the iPhone.
The funny thing is that while Apple are normally brilliant marketers in this regard, they’re actually holding back on Siri right now. Why? Because they consider the product to still be in “beta”. And while every Google product starts in beta, it’s not a tag Apple takes lightly. Talking with them leading up to the launch, they clearly feel that Siri as it stands right now, while a great first step, is nowhere near where they want it to be. It may take six months to get there. It may take a year. But when Apple does get it to where they feel it’s ready, I bet we’ll see a massive marketing push. And we may even see it come to other devices at that point.
Earlier today, Search Engine Land did a nice side-by-side comparison of Siri versus Google voice actions. Again, on paper, they’re similar, but in reality, they’re far apart right now. But the more interesting aspect of the piece to me was when author Greg Sterling goes against the this-will-kill-Google early reactions and notes that Siri should lead to even more Google searches. I totally agree. For now.
But again, this is a beta product. Does anyone really think Apple isn’t going to work quickly to integrate it with other data partners? Imagine it tied to Quora. Imagine it tied to Twitter (and how is it not already?!). Imagine it tied to Foursquare. Imagine it tied to… Facebook. If and when that happens, Google will have a very legitimate reason to be concerned.
Right now, Google is a middle man between us and information. And we love Google for it. There’s simply too much information out there for anyone to find by themselves. There needs to be a middle man. We need Google. Apple has been hinting for a while that mobile applications could change this game. But apps are just a new, perhaps more accesible wrapper of information. There still needs to be a search mechanism powering the discovery of information — that’s why everyone keeps insisting that Apple will eventually get into the search engine business.
Well they have. But not in the way that everyone was thinking. Siri is their entry point. Again, it’s a small step right now, but it has the potential to be massive. (Perhaps the more pressing question: is Apple okay relying heavily on a third party, Nuance, for what may become a core component of their stack?)
And that’s another fundamental reason why people are so excited by Siri where they aren’t by Google voice search. Google voice search, like basically every Google product, is ultimately a way to drive more Google searches. It’s just a new layer. Even if people don’t fully understand that, they sense that it doesn’t point to something totally new. Siri does point to something totally new. With it, Apple wants to change the information search and creation paradigm. It’s an evolution powered by mobile and a new, more powerful input: voice.
This is a vision that has been 24 years in the making at Apple. The video below first re-surfaced around the launch of the iPad. “Apple envisioned their tablet 20+ years ago!,” everyone yelled. But at the time, everyone overlooked the arguably more powerful aspect: natural language voice interaction. Apple was quietly working on that too. And now it’s here. Heralding the future.

16 Ekim 2011 Pazar

A.J. Hawk Flips Middle Finger: Packers Linebacker Makes Obscene Gesture After Sack

Green Bay Packers inside linebacker A.J. Hawk entered Sunday's game with just a half a sack to his credit through five games. Having recorded just a half of a sack all of last season as the Packers won the Super Bowl, Hawk may have thought that he'd already gotten his yearly allotment in the category.
Perhaps that is why Hawk was so very fired up when he sacked St. Louis quarterback Sam Bradford early in the second quarter of the Packers' demolition of the Rams. As part of his sack celebration, Hawk flipped his middle finger at someone. The act was caught by the CBS cameras and will surely earn the six-year veteran a fine.
Seeing as how Hawk was gesturing toward his own sideline it's possible that this finger wasn't flipped in anger. But that distinction probably won't make any difference to NFL Commissioner Roger Goodell.